What limits the liability of a security agency in relation to its employees?

The limit of liability for a security agency concerning its employees primarily comes into play when the employee is off duty. When security personnel are not actively engaged in their responsibilities or assigned duties, the agency is generally not held liable for their actions. This is because the relationship between the agency and the employee, which includes the agency's legal and financial responsibilities, is typically defined by the scope of employment.

If an employee is off duty, they are not acting within the parameters set by their employer, and therefore, the agency cannot be held responsible for any incidents that occur during that time. This principle underscores the importance of understanding the boundaries of an employee's role and the agency's accountability in relation to that role.

In contrast, factors such as the agency's financial resources, the length of employment, or the training an employee has received do not inherently limit liability in the same way. Financial resources pertain more to the agency's ability to respond to claims rather than legal liability. Length of employment and training can affect an employee's performance or the agency’s operations but do not themselves create a shield from liability when an employee is off duty. Thus, the correct focus is on the employment status of the individual at the time of the incident.